So when Hizbullah waged an unnecessary and destructive war against Israel in 2006, or when they embroiled Lebanon in regional proxy battles and made us part of the Iranian-Syrian axis, they were safeguarding the interest of our country?
HA do what pleases HA and Iran. It wasn't till recent years that they accepted references to Lebanon.FPMers suffer from a bipolar disorder. One day they claim to be neutral, the next day they're praising Hizbullah's intervention in Syria and defending the "jeish, sha3eb, muqawama" formula.
You can't claim not to have an ideological war with Israel when you're allied with a terrorist organization whose sole purpose is to wipe Israel off the map and fight Iran's proxy battles in the region.
FPM and HA s relationship was based on survival. Technically HA have no plans to better life in Lebanon. Their religious agenda may clash with other religions. So they leave the Lebanese internal policies on the back burner or hand it to berri.
Berri is in a comfortable place and cares less about corruption fighting.
So we have reached a conundrem.
It's the divorce that we have to have to move forward. If it happens , then 14 March take control by numbers and may fight HA again as they did on may 8 based on foreign advice and training.
HA need to take a stand on wiping out corruption or Lebanon will end up in a civil war again and again. Israel would like that.