I can't believe you're trying to backtrack and rewrite what you already posted, but with a different meaning.
When you confidently affirmed : "
This is not proven" it goes without saying that there is no space here, to come back later and claim that you were just in the course of saying stuff without decisiveness or certainty. There is no "seems" or "yet" here. Consequently, this is a claim rightfully pointed at as a bold claim, and it was addressed respectfully and with references. So no, I understood well what you wrote, but the truth is that you didn't take the rebuttal well. So you went sideways.
Which made you jump to the next part, which is to try and evade the point by targeting the poster, claiming and preaching the following: " if you are not a doctor please do not advise others and peddle conspiracy theories let people deal with it with a trained physician. Only medical doctors can prescribe meds!"
First, I was debating a factual point, not giving any medical advice, nor prescribing meds!. Second, if saying that there are doctors advancing clear numbers of real patients proving that a certain treatment works, is now called "a conspiracy theory", then obviously, you're not here to debate. Third, YOU are the one here, clearly in the course of discrediting a treatment prescribed by
real doctors and advising against it, yet you had the nerves to lecture others, who are simply debating a factual point, (not a medical one), not to give medical advice if they are not doctors?
And after all that, you still found the courage to tell me "I just expected a better debate from you"?
Lik just read yourself back and see how you went all bazooka on me just because I was in the course of refuting your original bold claim.
I am the one who should tell you that I expected a better debate...Khedna B7elmak Shway
www.sciencedirect.com
