• Before posting an article from a specific source, check this list here to see how much the Orange Room trust it. You can also vote/change your vote based on the source track record.

2019 Coronavirus Disease "COVID-19" [Vaccinations Underway Worldwide]


طبيب لبناني بتصريح مفاجئ: لهذا السبب لن آخذ لقاح "فايزر"

"أنا لا أجبر أحداً على اللقاح أو عدم اللقاح بل أبدي قلقي وحذري منه. ولا يمكنني ان أبرهن قلقي لكني بعد كل ما قرأت (مشيراً الى كتب تتستّف على مكتبه) لي كل الحق بالقلق". ويستطرد: "ألاعيب شركات الأدوية كثيرة لذا من حقي ومن حق الكثيرين أن نقلق". لكن، الكثير من الأميركيين، كما الأوروبيين، أخذوا اللقاح وأرقام الموت هناك بدأت تتقلص. فكيف يفسر هذا؟ يجيب: "حذري سببه أن الإعلام العالمي ممسوك، والتهويل الذي يمارس عالمياً لا يليق بالعلم. أسلوب التخويف غير مريح. وأنظمة البحث العلمي أصبحت خاضعة لهيمنة سلطة الرأسمال". وتابعت: "هو سيأخذ، من جهته اللقاح لكن الصيني أو الروسي لأن لقاح فايزر يحتوي، على ما قال،
على شيفرة جينية".


Oh dear... press on the link from the interview, they interview more than 3 doctors and lebanon24 chooses one doctor who is controversial and wrong (he is also a gastro doctor who did not even taken care of covid patients nor it's his speciality) and they try to spin it into some conspiracy theory.

typical lebanese media and yet they want to get vaccinated first before the vulnerable and elderly

I'm done with this shit, you guys go on and believe fairy tales about gene editing in vaccines and some "capitalist" take over of the world. All I know is that the CDC and Israel have released their preliminary research on how vaccines have stopped transmission and moderate/severe disease in individuals who took pfizer and other brands.
 

Manifesto

Legendary Member
Orange Room Supporter
Oh dear... press on the link from the interview, they interview more than 3 doctors and lebanon24 chooses one doctor who is controversial and wrong (he is also a gastro doctor who did not even taken care of covid patients nor it's his speciality) and they try to spin it into some conspiracy theory.

typical lebanese media and yet they want to get vaccinated first before the vulnerable and elderly

I'm done with this shit, you guys go on and believe fairy tales about gene editing in vaccines and some "capitalist" take over of the world. All I know is that the CDC and Israel have released their preliminary research on how vaccines have stopped transmission and moderate/severe disease in individuals who took pfizer and other brands.

The Pfizer vaccine is causing blindness in some cases, but the governments are downplaying its risks.

This is the official data about the Pfizer adverse effects. You won't hear any doctors or pharma companies talking about this.

 

Mrsrx

Not an expert!
Staff member
The Pfizer vaccine is causing blindness in some cases, but the governments are downplaying its risks.

This is the official data about the Pfizer adverse effects. You won't hear any doctors or pharma companies talking about this.


Do you always get your news from "dailyexpose.co.uk"? ...

Anyway lets give them the benefit of the doubt. The screenshot they took i followed the link and it says:

TLDR: These are raw results based on reporting only and not investigated. Where people fill them out and it is not controled nor studied (yet). General rule of thumb if the title starts with "SHOCKING' it is meant to shock you and not inform you.

Annex 1: Vaccine Analysis Print​

The attached Vaccine Analysis Profile contains a complete listing of all suspected adverse reactions or that have been reported to the MHRA via the Yellow Card scheme for the COVID-19 mRNA Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine. This includes all reports received from healthcare professionals, members of the public, and pharmaceutical companies.

This information does not represent an overview of the potential side effects associated with the vaccines. A list of the recognised adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines is provided in the information for healthcare professionals and the recipient information here. These can also be found on the Coronavirus Yellow Card reporting site. Conclusions on the safety and risks of the vaccines cannot be made on the data shown in the Print alone.

When viewing the vaccine analysis print you should remember that:

  • Reporters are asked to submit Yellow Card reports even if they only have a suspicion that the medicine may have caused the adverse reaction. The existence of an adverse reaction report in the print does not necessarily mean that the vaccine has caused the suspected reaction.
  • It may be difficult to tell the difference between something that has occurred naturally and a suspected adverse reaction. Sometimes these events can be part of the condition being treated rather than being caused by the vaccine.
  • Many factors have to be considered when assessing whether the vaccine has caused a reported adverse reaction. When monitoring the safety of vaccines and medicines, MHRA staff carry out careful analysis of these factors.
For a medicine or vaccine to be considered safe, the expected benefits will be greater than the risk of having harmful reactions. It is important to note that most people take medicines and vaccines without having any serious side effects.

 

Manifesto

Legendary Member
Orange Room Supporter
Do you always get your news from "dailyexpose.co.uk"? ...

Anyway lets give them the benefit of the doubt. The screenshot they took i followed the link and it says:

TLDR: These are raw results based on reporting only and not investigated. Where people fill them out and it is not controled nor studied (yet). General rule of thumb if the title starts with "SHOCKING' it is meant to shock you and not inform you.

Annex 1: Vaccine Analysis Print​

The attached Vaccine Analysis Profile contains a complete listing of all suspected adverse reactions or that have been reported to the MHRA via the Yellow Card scheme for the COVID-19 mRNA Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine. This includes all reports received from healthcare professionals, members of the public, and pharmaceutical companies.

This information does not represent an overview of the potential side effects associated with the vaccines. A list of the recognised adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines is provided in the information for healthcare professionals and the recipient information here. These can also be found on the Coronavirus Yellow Card reporting site. Conclusions on the safety and risks of the vaccines cannot be made on the data shown in the Print alone.

When viewing the vaccine analysis print you should remember that:

  • Reporters are asked to submit Yellow Card reports even if they only have a suspicion that the medicine may have caused the adverse reaction. The existence of an adverse reaction report in the print does not necessarily mean that the vaccine has caused the suspected reaction.
  • It may be difficult to tell the difference between something that has occurred naturally and a suspected adverse reaction. Sometimes these events can be part of the condition being treated rather than being caused by the vaccine.
  • Many factors have to be considered when assessing whether the vaccine has caused a reported adverse reaction. When monitoring the safety of vaccines and medicines, MHRA staff carry out careful analysis of these factors.
For a medicine or vaccine to be considered safe, the expected benefits will be greater than the risk of having harmful reactions. It is important to note that most people take medicines and vaccines without having any serious side effects.


Hayda rfi2ak @SoFP1 ba3atleh el link. Chouf chou baddak ta3moul ma3o.
 
The Pfizer vaccine is causing blindness in some cases, but the governments are downplaying its risks.

This is the official data about the Pfizer adverse effects. You won't hear any doctors or pharma companies talking about this.


No it didn't
 

CitizenOfTheRepublic

Legendary Member
I’m sorry but anyone with a high school knowledge of the cellular protein synthesis process knows full well that RNA cannot turn into DNA. DNA to RNA transcription is a one way street! This heresy by some unscrupulous attention seekers is yet another flat earth theory at best.
If a doctor dabbles with it, you may want to seek medical help elsewhere.
 

NewLeb

Member
Nothing has changed; the mindless zombies who are “listening to the experts” are the same sheep who were controlled by the religious authorities of the past...

C0539DE5-C84F-4780-A2E6-895CC093C0CB.jpeg
 

NewLeb

Member
The Pfizer vaccine is causing blindness in some cases, but the governments are downplaying its risks.

This is the official data about the Pfizer adverse effects. You won't hear any doctors or pharma companies talking about this.


Dang, bro, you triggered the whole thread. Good job!
 

Mrsrx

Not an expert!
Staff member
I’m sorry but anyone with a high school knowledge of the cellular protein synthesis process knows full well that RNA cannot turn into DNA. DNA to RNA transcription is a one way street! This heresy by some unscrupulous attention seekers is yet another flat earth theory at best.
If a doctor dabbles with it, you may want to seek medical help elsewhere.
If it was possible i would look like brad pitt by now...
 

Manifesto

Legendary Member
Orange Room Supporter

I have to disagree with you on this one.
Which sounds safer in your opinion?
1-Having someone sneeze directly on your face.
2-Using a barrier between you and that person, to protect yourself from his respiratory droplets.

I don't know how these "so-called" scientists come up with these studies.
It's not rocket science, really. Masks work. There's a reason the majority of healthcare workers don't get infected while treating Covid patients.
 
Top