Iran's Qasem Soleimani admits involvement in the 2006 war?

MELF

MELF

Well-Known Member
Orange Room Supporter
Of course, Israel takes all precautions to avoid civilians casualties by spraying indiscriminate 4 million cluster bomblets all over south Lebanon...
In related news, a surgeon used a chainsaw to perform a minimally invasive appendix removal.
Over territory used by a terrorist organization to attack Israel and threaten Israelis -- yes, why wouldn't they use such a weapon or any weapon at their disposal for that matter.

You have yet to condemn Hizbullah and Suleimani for using your country as battleground so what exactly are you crying about here? Don't attack Israel they won't attack you. It's that simple.
 
  • Advertisement
  • CitizenOfTheRepublic

    CitizenOfTheRepublic

    Legendary Member
    Over territory used by a terrorist organization to attack Israel and threaten Israelis -- yes, why wouldn't they use such a weapon or any weapon at their disposal for that matter.[...]
    It's not about whether they can use it or not, it about using such an indiscriminate weapon in such a scale and then falsely claiming to "take all precautions to avoid civilians casualties". You can't do both, it's one or the other.
     
    MELF

    MELF

    Well-Known Member
    Orange Room Supporter
    It's not about whether they can use it or not, it about using such an indiscriminate weapon in such a scale and then falsely claiming to "take all precautions to avoid civilians casualties". You can't do both, it's one or the other.
    Not all precautions perhaps, but definitely many and certainly far more than the precautions the enemy takes not to harm Israeli civilians. Taking "all" precautions means not retaliating against terrorists launching rockets from residential neighborhoods, and why would Israel ever consider that.

    If the enemy takes zero precautions and Israel takes some, then Israel holds the moral high ground. Especially that they are not the instigator of the war, but rather acting in a self-defense capacity.
     
    CitizenOfTheRepublic

    CitizenOfTheRepublic

    Legendary Member
    Not all precautions perhaps, but definitely many and certainly far more than the precautions the enemy takes not to harm Israeli civilians. Taking "all" precautions means not retaliating against terrorists launching rockets from residential neighborhoods, and why would Israel ever consider that.

    If the enemy takes zero precautions and Israel takes some, then Israel holds the moral high ground. Especially that they are not the instigator of the war, but rather acting in a self-defense capacity.
    Israel holds no moral high ground when it uses such a weapon, at best it is at the same level as its enemy.
     
    MELF

    MELF

    Well-Known Member
    Orange Room Supporter
    Israel holds no moral high ground when it uses such a weapon, at best it is at the same level as its enemy.
    If you don't wish Israel to use these kinds of weapons or disproportionate force in the future, then restrain the terrorists and prevent them from threatening Israel.
    Short of that, you have no one but yourselves to blame. Israel won't unilaterally disarm itself when "Hadrian is at the gates."
     
    MELF

    MELF

    Well-Known Member
    Orange Room Supporter
    Google Dahiya Doctrine.
    What do you think about it?
    Also, what do you think about Qassem Suleimani sacrificing Lebanese lives and infrastructure for sake of Iran's regional hegemony?
     
    Last edited:
    Top