Jerusalem was caananite before israelite hordes occupied it. Therefore we should get it back and plus, tyrians built its temples, so i think south Lebanese have a strong connection to the city too and this must be taken into consideration.
If the Muslims can turn Hagia Sophia into a mosque, the Jews must turn Al Aqsa into a synagogue.
Muslims have set the precedent.
Those from Poland are thieves but those from the desert are indigenous?When 99% of the Palestinians convert to Judaism, then yes, they would have the right to turn the Aqsa mosque into a synagogue. But not someone from Poland who is a land thief in God's name. The people who own Aqsa and Jerusalem and Palestine are very much alive, present and demanding for their rights to end the occupation. What you have in Palestine is occupation and not conquest. You haven't conquered the Palestinian people and the Palestinian people have not submitted, accepted or embraced Judaism or your citizenship or authority. They are very much resisting your presence.
And I do not support Erdogan's political or election campaign to turn a historical church, which became a museum, into a mosque. I do not support that because in the teaching of Islam, when you forcefully acquire a place or you have stolen it from its owners, e.g. a land or building, you cant pray on/in it. When you pray on/in stolen property or property forcefully taken, your prayers in it are null and void. Your prayers wont be accepted.
Israelites were Canaanites, dummy. Canaanite language = Phoenician = Biblical Hebrew. and by south Lebanese, only the Christians are related to the ancient Galileans.
Those from Poland are thieves but those from the desert are indigenous?
The question is not whether Israelis or Lebanese are indeed from the land or not. Some Israelis are really from Israel although at least half of them came from Europe. Same with Lebanese, some are really from the Phoenician era although in today’s population, a big part comes from the Arabic peninsula, some from Persia but also from Mongolia, Armenia, Greece, etc.So Israelites and by extension Jews are not semitic. Canaanites were not a semitic people. By claiming to be Canaanite, you've just rid yourself of the God justification for stealing lands. And if you arent descended from Canaanites, then there is a problem that you arent original.
You cant eat your cake and have it.
The Palestinians, as the Lebanese and Syrians can claim a mosaic of descent and origins, including semitic and Canaanite origins. We admit we are not descended from one race or ethnic nationality. We are descended from many and that's what gives us legitimacy to claim Palestine, Lebanon and Syria, even as Arabic speakers and as Muslims or Christians. But you cant claim to be Canaanite and homogenously Jewish at the same time because you need to legitimize your occupation by portraying yourself as indigenous through Canaanites. It is ridiculous. In fact, there might be no link or connection between present day Israehellis and ancient Israelites. Look at Yemeni Jews, Ethipioan Jews, Sepahrdic Jews, Mizrahi, and Ashkenazi. Do they all look alike? Of course not. Other than following the same fairytales, you dont look alike and you dont share common genetic origins. Stop confusing yourself. You are thieves in God's name because you were supported by antisemitic Europeans to get rid of your presence in Europe. Harameh harameh sohyooni harameh.