you didn't answer my question
HE INVITED THEM SEVERAL TIMES... why didn't they go?
you want him to be at the service of the people, and don't want those specialists to talk to him. And yet he wants you to save them.
I am sorry, but that logic is sinking
You are stuck with the hate of one person, rather than trying to find a solution.
Just so we don't get stuck with the same arguments about if the revolution should have representatived.
A couple of economical activitists started talking about the crisis and what is exactly happening and ways out, like Jad Chaaban and Dan Azzi and Mohammad zbeeb.
They were only tweeting and directly they started making videos on them and conspirscy theories about their plan to become ministers and this is why they're saying this.
So if people are tweeting and this is their feedback, what will happen if they meet the president.
In the interview with the president when PMA asked why don't they name someone, Nicolas Nassif said "inno bitrakboulo malaf" and he was right.
But still the problem is not here, the problem is that the people in the revolution are unified (kind of) on the demands but not on the solutions, this is why no one can represent them before having a legitimate way to show their shares.
what i mean if now communists claim they represent the revolution no one will accept it or of beirut madinati or....
This is why they're focusing on headlines because it's easier to agree on these.
Is there a better way? i don't know in history how revolutions have succeded to have a reference