Living under Zionist Israel [Unrest in Jerusalem]

Gsheb

New Member
Very simple. The Law of Return has nothing to do with ownership laws.

Really? So a Palestinian who was driven out of his pre 48 home and cannot take it back has nothing to do with 'ownership laws'?

What's your definition of an 'ownership law'? Mine is any law that has an effect on property ownership.

If you want something directly relevant to East Jerusalem, here you go:

 
Last edited:

Manifesto

Legendary Member
Orange Room Supporter
That's how you know they're triggered.

Bella Hadid should keep doing what she's doing.

Apparently, she was chanting 'Palestine will be free. From the river to the sea'.

So they interpreted that as her wanting to throw Jews into the sea. 🙄
 

Gsheb

New Member
Apparently, she was chanting 'Palestine will be free. From the river to the sea'.

So they interpreted that as her wanting to throw Jews into the sea. 🙄

No, she did not chant that. They were talking about what she wrote on instegram that Pals are suffering from racism and colonialism.. Which said nothing about Jews from river to sea or whatever. They made up a total fabrication, which means: triggered.
 

SeaAb

Legendary Member
Staff member
Super Penguin
E1loII9WQAYRZGo
 

Manifesto

Legendary Member
Orange Room Supporter
No, she did not chant that. They were talking about what she wrote on instegram that Pals are suffering from racism and colonialism.. Which said nothing about Jews from river to sea or whatever. They made up a total fabrication, which means: triggered.

She says it at second 22 if you play the video. But it's BS if you ask me. Bella has clarified on numerous occasions that she doesn't condone anti-Semitism. She also called on her followers to distinguish between Jews and Zionists.

Anyway, it's good that someone as influential as Bella is using her platform to spread awareness.
She has millions of followers. No wonder Israel is triggered.
 

proIsrael-nonIsraeli

Legendary Member
Really? So a Palestinian who was driven out of his pre 48 home and cannot take it back has nothing to do with 'ownership laws'?

What's your definition of an 'ownership law'? Mine is any law that has an effect on property ownership.

If you want something directly relevant to East Jerusalem, here you go:


"So a Palestinian who was driven out of his pre 48 home" - it wasn't his home to be in in the first place.
 
Top