Some muslims celebrate the fire of Notre Dame. Is that a one off or a regular occurence?

[proIsrael-nonIsraeli]

Dude, there's about 2 billion muslims in the world. If you're searching for shit in the sewer, you're guaranteed to find it. Anyway, like Qu7 said, if Mecca is blown asunder, you and a sizeable population in the U.S. among other christians across the globe will throw a feast and a drunken fit. But just like these muslims, such spiteful christians are only a small minority (although you wouldn't think that if you read this forum...)

If you ever visited Notre Dame, you may have noticed many muslim tourists admiring its majesty and architectural significance.

I agree with your point and this is why I always suggested that the best way to battle Islamism is to slowly push Islam toward its own Renaissance, but Renaissance has to be done by Muslims themselves.

 

[Dynamite Joe]

80% of these 2 billon are just mini baghdadis ,
so whats your point ?

that sewer you talking about is the main body of water in islamuc oumma

That's all very nice. But just because you say it, doesn't make it factual. If 1.6 billion muslims were terrorists, the Whitehouse would be the Greenhouse and bear the crescent. You're trying awfully hard to resemble Baghdadi...

 

[Dynamite Joe]

I agree with your point and this is why I always suggested that the best way to battle Islamism is to slowly push Islam toward its own Renaissance, but Renaissance has to be done by Muslims themselves.

Certainly has to be done by muslims with a nudge every now and then to speed up the process. Waging wars and plundering their resources can only radicalise the new generation. That needs to end first and foremost. Instead of sending them bombs, they need economic assistance and be allowed to become self sufficient. Poverty is a breeding ground for radicalisation.

 

[HannaTheCrusader]

That's all very nice. But just because you say it, doesn't make it factual. If 1.6 billion muslims were terrorists, the Whitehouse would be the Greenhouse and bear the crescent. You're trying awfully hard to resemble Baghdadi...

no Muslims are a lot, but not stron enough to defeat or conquer anyone , except the few remaining minorities in their nations and each other

muslims have been weak for centuries and cant do much damage
studies after studied shows that majority of Muslims are for sharia
once you are for sharia, means you are a terrorist period
sharia is pure evil and a vile way of life

 

[Dynamite Joe]

no Muslims are a lot, but not stron enough to defeat or conquer anyone , except the few remaining minorities in their nations and each other

muslims have been weak for centuries and cant do much damage
studies after studied shows that majority of Muslims are for sharia
once you are for sharia, means you are a terrorist period
sharia is pure evil and a vile way of life

Yes, their nations are weak due to their retarded religion, ravages of the colonial era, and neo colonialism. The point is in the 21st century the race should not be about who has the mightier military, but rather coexistence and healthy competition. You’re not going to get rid of extremists by antagonising them. It’s simply adding fuel to the fire.

 

[Ice Tea]

no Muslims are a lot, but not stron enough to defeat or conquer anyone , except the few remaining minorities in their nations and each other

muslims have been weak for centuries and cant do much damage
studies after studied shows that majority of Muslims are for sharia
once you are for sharia, means you are a terrorist period
sharia is pure evil and a vile way of life

This. Just because one Muslim wouldn't be able of killing someone with their own hands or blowing themselves up doesn't mean they don't support when other Muslims commit such acts.

 

[HannaTheCrusader]

Yes, their nations are weak due to their retarded religion, ravages of the colonial era, and neo colonialism. The point is in the 21st century the race should not be about who has the mightier military, but rather coexistence and healthy competition. You’re not going to get rid of extremists by antagonising them. It’s simply adding fuel to the fire.

no the muslims nations became weak from the 900 AD or so
and only managed to have few ,far between military success and it was mainly due to the west than assisting one faction against other

even the ottomans, were always fearful of the euro pans powers and depite all their trials., couldnt defeat Constantinople , until the christian west decided to destroy it by assisting the muslims

yes at the beginning Islamic nations had a rapid rise in power, than by the 2nd century of hijra, they stagnated on all levels

so this ha nothing to do with the west, its predates the colonization

and crusaders is a big example, after islam failed to take over europe , the European took the fight to islam land and later on decided, no need to have permanent base , as we can control that region through proxies and thats what happened

muslims think they were a super power, like iran or saudi or egypt thinks today , ah and turkey too
while in reality , they were always contained by the non muslims, especially the chirstian west

 

[Ice Tea]

I agree with your point and this is why I always suggested that the best way to battle Islamism is to slowly push Islam toward its own Renaissance, but Renaissance has to be done by Muslims themselves.

ISIS was the Muslim 'Renaissance', they did a pretty good job reenacting the early Islamic conquests of Mohammed

 

[proIsrael-nonIsraeli]

Certainly has to be done by muslims with a nudge every now and then to speed up the process. Waging wars and plundering their resources can only radicalize the new generation. That needs to end first and foremost. Instead of sending them bombs, they need economic assistance and be allowed to become self sufficient. Poverty is a breeding ground for radicalization.

"Waging wars and plundering their resources can only radicalize the new generation" - this is complicated subject, I am not ready to turn another chick just yet.

 

[proIsrael-nonIsraeli]

ISIS was the Muslim 'Renaissance', they did a pretty good job reenacting the early Islamic conquests of Mohammed

OK, term "renaissance" might not be absolutely proper in this case, but I hope you understood my meaning still.

 

[HannaTheCrusader]

POLITICS
Turkish Newspaper Celebrates Notre Dame Fire as Retribution For France’s Recognition of Armenian Genocide

“The curse of Turkey is fulfilled.”

Published
1 hour ago
on
17 April, 2019
Paul Joseph Watson

A Turkish newspaper linked to the Erdogan regime celebrated the Notre Dame fire as revenge for France’s recognition of the Armenian Genocide.
“The famous cathedral of France up in flames. The curse of Turkey is fulfilled,” read the headline.

The Armenian Genocide, which began in April 1915, led to the systematic extermination of 1.5 million Armenians by the Ottoman government.
This is by no means the only example of the fire being celebrated in the Middle East.
Despite BuzzFeed lying in claiming no Muslims celebrated the blaze, the video below provides innumerous examples of precisely that.

 

[HannaTheCrusader]

Muslim Politician in Canada Says Notre Dame Fire Was “Divine Intervention”

Payback for France banning the Islamic veil.

Published
6 mins ago
on
17 April, 2019
Paul Joseph Watson

A Muslim politician in Canada wrote a Facebook post in which she said that the Notre Dame fire was “divine intervention” in response to France banning the Islamic veil.
Québec Solidaire member Eve Torres suggested that the tragedy was “a result of a divine intervention related to the prohibition of religious symbols in France,” according to LaPresse.ca.
France passed an act of parliament in 2010 which banned the wearing of face-covering headgear in public places, including the Muslim niqab and burka.
Torres said that the ban had provoked the “wrath” of Allah and “here is the result!”
She further added, “I would sleep firefighters at the basilica of Notre-Dame Street in Montreal,” suggesting that could be the next church to go up in flames.
The co-spokesperson of Quebec Solidaire, Manon Massé, said she was “very disturbed” by the comments and that they were in “very bad taste”.
Torres later apologized, claiming it was all just a “joke”. using islmaing taqiya lol

 

[proIsrael-nonIsraeli]

Muslim Politician in Canada Says Notre Dame Fire Was “Divine Intervention”

Payback for France banning the Islamic veil.

Published
6 mins ago
on
17 April, 2019
Paul Joseph Watson

• • 
    
  • 
    

A Muslim politician in Canada wrote a Facebook post in which she said that the Notre Dame fire was “divine intervention” in response to France banning the Islamic veil.
Québec Solidaire member Eve Torres suggested that the tragedy was “a result of a divine intervention related to the prohibition of religious symbols in France,” according to LaPresse.ca.
France passed an act of parliament in 2010 which banned the wearing of face-covering headgear in public places, including the Muslim niqab and burka.
Torres said that the ban had provoked the “wrath” of Allah and “here is the result!”
She further added, “I would sleep firefighters at the basilica of Notre-Dame Street in Montreal,” suggesting that could be the next church to go up in flames.
The co-spokesperson of Quebec Solidaire, Manon Massé, said she was “very disturbed” by the comments and that they were in “very bad taste”.
Torres later apologized, claiming it was all just a “joke”. using islmaing taqiya lol

The enemy within.

 

[Lebe]

I suggest you stop spreading the typical hatred that you've been spreading.

Official statements:
Iran regrets Notre Dame Cathedral destruction

Iran regrets Notre Dame Cathedral destruction

Tehran, April 16, IRNA – Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif expressed regret on Tuesday over destruction of part of historical Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, France, after massive fire.

www.irna.ir

Below is what fellow Christians are saying :

--------
'God's Punishment': Serbian Tabloids Say Notre Dame Fire Result Of Flying Kosovo's Flag

Serbian Tabloids Say Notre Dame Blaze Was 'God's Punishment'

The Serbian president has expressed solidarity with France while the press aligned with him fans the flames of nationalism over the Notre Dame blaze.

www.rferl.org

----------

 

[GrumpForTrump]

speaking the truth always has its detractors
you claim to be an atheist, and your posts oozes political islam

another hypocrite who have a mini daesh hidden deep inside

Reported for character defamation.
This is a grave accusation.
You can't go around and accuse people of being Daeshis just because they happen to disagree with you.

 

[proIsrael-nonIsraeli]

Reported for character defamation.
This is a grave accusation.
You can't go around and accuse people of being Daeshis just because they happen to disagree with you.

The reply looked to me like an analysis (correct or not) based on your posts, not empty accusations due to frustrated disagreement.

 

[Dynamite Joe]

"Waging wars and plundering their resources can only radicalize the new generation" - this is complicated subject, I am not ready to turn another chick just yet.

It is complicated. It's a matter of economic exploitation vs. backminded medieval junk. Two wrongs can never make a right, thus the quagmire.

 

[Dynamite Joe]

no the muslims nations became weak from the 900 AD or so
and only managed to have few ,far between military success and it was mainly due to the west than assisting one faction against other

even the ottomans, were always fearful of the euro pans powers and depite all their trials., couldnt defeat Constantinople , until the christian west decided to destroy it by assisting the muslims

yes at the beginning Islamic nations had a rapid rise in power, than by the 2nd century of hijra, they stagnated on all levels

so this ha nothing to do with the west, its predates the colonization

and crusaders is a big example, after islam failed to take over europe , the European took the fight to islam land and later on decided, no need to have permanent base , as we can control that region through proxies and thats what happened

muslims think they were a super power, like iran or saudi or egypt thinks today , ah and turkey too
while in reality , they were always contained by the non muslims, especially the chirstian west

The reality is in the Dark Ages up until the European renaissance, Islam was far more enlightened, intellectual, civilised and cultured than any fiefdom in the western world. If we lived 1,000 years ago, the barbarians were the crusaders. A collection of vindictive brutal savages who were motivated only by greed and mobilised by the most vile religious institution mankind has ever seen, the catholic church.

 

[Ice Tea]

The reality is in the Dark Ages up until the European renaissance, Islam was far more enlightened, intellectual, civilised and cultured than any fiefdom in the western world. If we lived 1,000 years ago, the barbarians were the crusaders. A collection of vindictive brutal savages who were motivated only by greed and mobilised by the most vile religious institution mankind has ever seen, the catholic church.

 

[Ice Tea]

The Muslim/Arab conquest of the Levant were actually some of the most brutal and violent battles in history.