-
Before posting an article from a specific source, check this list here to see how much the Orange Room trust it. You can also vote/change your vote based on the source track record.
UN/US Brokered Negotiations Between Lebanon and Israel to Demarcate Maritime Borders
- Thread starter SeaAb
- Start date
Genius
Legendary Member
Ali barakat covers alloushis and bassilis. Mar mkhaeil theater, no alcohol, Pepsi and mango juice, extra glucose special for new year's. Release of a new nashid.
Elisa in maarab hall. Tab3an tab3an akeed.
No concerts this year. 7aram
agnostic
Legendary Member
Orange Hope
Well-Known Member
Chiu dakhal el army? Are they behind this presentation?
agnostic
Legendary Member
The LA officers worked on defining the demarcation line, however with the assistance of foreign expertise, in a very professional way (which is really surprising coming from the Lebanese) by taking account of needed legal aspects to preserve Lebanon's rights.
* Added : sometimes a single word can strongly affect a whole document. The L.A. mentioning that the document could be subject of justified modification was legally extremely important.
Last edited:
Berri is unhappy with Lebanon's new position and has already signed off on the 860km line, w HA 3emel 7alo ma sheyef shi. Yet, the same duo issued a harsh statement taking exception to GMA's delegation. Smallah 3leykon - l sovereignty 3am tsharsher menkon. #2260>890
Note this is the Same lebanese army with the same leadership...! Well done to them and looking forward that the government deposit the new boundary line with the UN
Informative...
الحدود البحرية والحقوق اللبنانية/ نهاركم سعيد 18-1-2021
الحدود البحرية والحقوق اللبنانية/ نهاركم سعيد 18-1-2021
Exactly! Berri handed over the negotiation file to GMA to get the monkey off his back because he can't take the risk of being sanctioned.
Once again we witness how our corrupt leaders are our liabilities and why the West protects them and want to destroy the clean ones like Bassil and GMA that they can't blackmail.
First comment is that Lauri is well articulated and clear. Second is that she is right, third is that the outcome of her interview, that Diab is not moving it forward because Berri doesn’t want to, is weak: where is GMA and his pressure? If he is pressuring he needs to do it publicly... who cares what Berri wants in this case? And there is no love lost between GMA and Berri... net i think there are bigger threats than “Berri doesn’t want”... but no one is saying what they are. So they either say what the threats are, or make the bloody marsoom, or they are accountable for the failure. By they I mean the executive, from the president to the prime minister and all the cabinet.
thumb up for Aoun.
But I want to also remind you that Tony Haddad in his interview said that Bassil and his agents in the palace are not happy with the new map that he (Tony Haddad) worked on it with LA and others....
At the end Tony Haddad was fired...
farjini el facepalm, yalla la shouf
And what exactly is HA doing in this regard according to your opinion, especially if it turns out that Berri is actually in secret supporting the Americo/Isreali negotiating standpoint to please the Americans for fear of their wrath against him?
Or do I need to ask them directly, via @agnostic?
This is a story...! The media needs to stick to one thread: either Bassil is in control of everything and therefore he has approved this map, or GMA isthumb up for Aoun.
But I want to also remind you that Tony Haddad in his interview said that Bassil and his agents in the palace are not happy with the new map that he (Tony Haddad) worked on it with LA and others....
At the end Tony Haddad was fired...
farjini el facepalm, yalla la shouf
Independent and went with this regardless of Bassil, or both Bassil and GMA are happy with the map and strategy and this story about Bassil not being happy is fake...!
You got it wrong, it is not the media, Tony Haddad is the guy that Bassil implicitly accused that he was behind the US sanctions.
He worked on the map with the LA and was the advisor of PMA on this matter.
In his interview he clearly said that Bassil was not happy about the new map.
Why it was adopted at the end ? I don't know, probably because LA insisted ?!
the LA insisted is not a reason... the decision maker here is the president, as he has the final authority to lead the negotiations... so if you chose to believe Haddad, then GMA is NOT in Bassil's pocket and acts independently, completely undermining the media spin of "Bassil controls everything"... one of Bassil or GMA gets credit here no matter one's feelings for either of them.
Similar threads
- Locked
