Who murdered the most Innocent Human Beings on Earth?

Dynamite Joe

Dynamite Joe

Well-Known Member
Viral said:
Crusader in Chief wants to starve Venezuela's Catholic chidden to death for regime change.
Why? For ExxonMobil to do busine$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ there... Why let born again Christian Bush do better then him in Iraq.
Different Crusaders. Same game...
Comments? Excuses?

www.rt.com

‘Prevent anything going in’: Report claims Trump repeatedly considered Venezuela blockade

US President Donald Trump has repeatedly suggested deploying warships along Venezuela’s coast to enforce a naval blockade, a report claims, citing officials. Trump earlier signaled he was eyeing the move, but was short on details.
www.rt.com www.rt.com

‘Prevent anything going in’: Report claims Trump repeatedly considered Venezuela blockade
View attachment 13136
Click to expand...

When we say the government and its chiefs Trump, Obama, Bush, Clinton.... We are talking about leaders elected by the people. Those who voted for Trump knew exactly what they were getting as with the brexiteers in the UK. In other words, sometimes we focus all the blame on elected officials and forget that they are a reflection of their electorate, not just lobbyists. We can see this when politicians go Rambo in their first term and still manage to secure a second term for presidents, and multiple terms in the legislative branches. If there was enough support and energy for independent candidates free from the shackles of the main parties, even corporate America couldn't prevent it. The problem with empires are people become spoilt and set in their ways. They tend to cling to archaic ideas or value the status quo over the instability that may arise from shaking up a political system and coming to terms with cultural defects. But eventually external factors begin disturbing the status quo internally. It will happen at some point.
 
C

Curiosum

New Member
Dark Angel said:
actually science is strictly about uncovering a unique and an absolute truth inscribed in what is much stronger and much more durable than stone and from which every deviation is a falsehood. not to be confused with stubborn people as yourself with a static mentality set in stone who do not recognize the error of their ways, and it is that very brand of people that derails ideologies and causes all kinds of tragedy including the killing of millions of innocents, which i remind you is the topic of the thread, not religion nor ideologies, but that also goes to indicate that yours was an act of deceit from the beginning.

you are all about falsehoods, we have had this very discussion countless times before, and it is becoming literally disgusting.
Click to expand...

Friedrich Nietzsche famously suggested that an ancient, metaphysical belief in the divinity of Truth lies at the heart of and has served as the foundation for the entire subsequent Western intellectual tradition: "But you will have gathered what I am getting at, namely, that it is still a metaphysical faith on which our faith in science rests--that even we knowers of today, we godless anti-metaphysicians still take our fire too, from the flame lit by the thousand-year old faith, the Christian faith which was also Plato's faith, that God is Truth; that Truth is 'Divine'..."[6][7]
 
Dark Angel

Dark Angel

Legendary Member
Dynamite Joe said:
No sir, that’s the business of God and those who converse with him.
Click to expand...
and yet, deux droites parallèles ne se rencontrent jamais.

here is another absolute truth for you, those who do not recognize and acknowledge the existence of absolute truth are either liars or idiots, or both.
 
Dynamite Joe

Dynamite Joe

Well-Known Member
Dark Angel said:
and yet, deux droites parallèles ne se rencontrent jamais.

here is another absolute truth for you, those who do not recognize and acknowledge the existence of absolute truth are either liars or idiots, or both.
Click to expand...

Maybe they do in another dimension or the twilight zone. It could also be true that DA is an agnostic at heart
 
Dynamite Joe

Dynamite Joe

Well-Known Member
Indie said:
You should re-read our conversation. Your end of it does not logically follow.
Click to expand...

In the absence of evidence of a God, it's the default position that there's no deities, nor fairies for that matter. The claimant bears the burden of proof. Now the part you didn't comprehend is your religion states unequivocally that there is a God and we must all follow him, or else. That is the definition of absolutism.
 
V

Viral

Active Member
Dynamite Joe said:
In the absence of evidence of a God, it's the default position that there's no deities, nor fairies for that matter. The claimant bears the burden of proof. Now the part you didn't comprehend is your religion states unequivocally that there is a God and we must all follow him, or else. That is the definition of absolutism.
Click to expand...
Bummer.:(
Naked truth making every religious thread on this forum obsolete.
Houston We have a problem.;)
 
C

Curiosum

New Member
Dynamite Joe said:
In the absence of evidence of a God, it's the default position that there's no deities, nor fairies for that matter. The claimant bears the burden of proof. Now the part you didn't comprehend is your religion states unequivocally that there is a God and we must all follow him, or else. That is the definition of absolutism.
Click to expand...

What evidence and what God are you talking about? I'm genuinely interested in how all that thing plays out in your ilk's heads for decades despite all the help offered.

The assumption you're basing this tired old parroted rhetoric on, namely the 'one fewer god' objection , that all gods share an equal likelihood of existence (and that therefore if we dismiss the ancient mythology gods, we ought to dismiss (our) God) is precisely what any
theist would deny. If there are good reasons to think that God (with a capital G) exists, it means little that we don’t believe in gods of ancient mythology, it means little that gods of ancient mythology don't actually exist (or that there are no good reasons to think that they exist).
 
Last edited:
V

Viral

Active Member
Dynamite Joe said:
When we say the government and its chiefs Trump, Obama, Bush, Clinton.... We are talking about leaders elected by the people. Those who voted for Trump knew exactly what they were getting
Click to expand...
Come think of it, even dictators are the product of their own society let alone elected leaders.
You’re right people who allow their leaders to be in power and use their tax money to destroy others are directly responsible for the outcome. There will be a price to pay for their lack of responsibilities.
Dynamite Joe said:
eventually external factors begin disturbing the status quo internally.
Click to expand...
As we’ve witness, only military resistance has given positive results for deterrence.
 
C

Curiosum

New Member
Just to illustrate the idiocy and/or the wickedness at play here; just because there's counterfeit money, it doesn't follow, nor does it show, that there's no real money. One would come out as a nutcase or a wicked person if they go around telling people 'in the absence of evidence of real money, it's the default position that there's no real money. The claimant bears the burden of proof. Now the part you didn't comprehend is your religion states unequivocally that there is actual money and we must all believe this, or else. That is the definition of absolutism.'
 
Dark Angel

Dark Angel

Legendary Member
Dynamite Joe said:
In the absence of evidence of a God, it's the default position that there's no deities, nor fairies for that matter. The claimant bears the burden of proof. Now the part you didn't comprehend is your religion states unequivocally that there is a God and we must all follow him, or else. That is the definition of absolutism.
Click to expand...
1- the default position of conscious and non-comatose beings is that God exists, simply because there is something instead of nothing.
2- stop repeating the burden of proof mantra. no one cares whether you are convinced or not, and no one is trying to convince you of anything.
3- God is not even the subject of discussion in this thread.
4- that is not what @Indie 's religion states.
5- that is not the definition of absolutism.

you have been fleeing from one subject to the next for the last 10 years and you have walked that same path and made the same false statements hundreds of times. and you are still right where you have started intellectually, despite the fact that you seem to have nothing better to do than to engage us on the subject of God and religion, you have not managed to evolve your argument a single bit.

te3tir, if you ask me.
 
Indie

Indie

Legendary Member
Orange Room Supporter
Dynamite Joe said:
In the absence of evidence of a God, it's the default position that there's no deities, nor fairies for that matter. The claimant bears the burden of proof. Now the part you didn't comprehend is your religion states unequivocally that there is a God and we must all follow him, or else. That is the definition of absolutism.
Click to expand...

You are shifting the conversation, which was neither about religion, nor the absence or existence of God. It was about a statement you made regarding truth. You said:

"There is no absolute truth."

Is that statement an absolute truth?
 
Dynamite Joe

Dynamite Joe

Well-Known Member
Dark Angel said:
1- the default position of conscious and non-comatose beings is that God exists, simply because there is something instead of nothing.
2- stop repeating the burden of proof mantra. no one cares whether you are convinced or not, and no one is trying to convince you of anything.
3- God is not even the subject of discussion in this thread.
4- that is not what @Indie 's religion states.
5- that is not the definition of absolutism.

you have been fleeing from one subject to the next for the last 10 years and you have walked that same path and made the same false statements hundreds of times. and you are still right where you have started intellectually, despite the fact that you seem to have nothing better to do than to engage us on the subject of God and religion, you have not managed to evolve your argument a single bit.

te3tir, if you ask me.
Click to expand...

ab·so·lut·ism
/ˈabsəl(y)o͞oˌtizəm/

noun: absolutism
  1. the acceptance of or belief in absolute principles in political, philosophical, ethical, or theological matters.
 
Dark Angel

Dark Angel

Legendary Member
Dynamite Joe said:
ab·so·lut·ism
/ˈabsəl(y)o͞oˌtizəm/
noun: absolutism
  1. the acceptance of or belief in absolute principles in political, philosophical, ethical, or theological matters.
Click to expand...
you do not get the differences between this proper definition and your earlier statements, do you? do not bother with an answer. this whole thread was born dead. no need to prolong the agony.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top