Not interested in opening a topic about my moral theory here or Nietzsche's. As you seem to be asking for a defense of my morality. We can do this in private.
Judaism itself is rooted in Paganism. Prophet Abraham is nothing more than Brahma. And his Sara is Sarawati. Even their own Hebrew language, their main religious symbols, their "inner sanctum" in temples and their main religious rituals are stolen or "inspired" from Pagans.
View attachment 13182
View attachment 13183
On Christianity, you find pagan roots in: Virgin birth, Ash Wednesday (which Jesus speaks against but is done by many Christians, but it's important to mention because it shows you how people maintain their old religions in every new faith), Appearance of God's Logos in Man like in Buddhism, Hindu Baptism (Jewish rituals defer than John the Baptist's additions), the Eucharist (previously celebrated by many Pagan cults long before your faith), etc.
Christianity is in no way in agreement or in a continuation of Judaism. Like Islam did to Christianity, Christianity did to Judaism. It mummified all its prophets into names you mention while not even bothering to know them.
Judaism is not even monotheist or universal to begin with. The so-called "prophets" did different rituals to different Kaananite Gods (mistranslated on purpose as the same God to repackage Judaism). Yahweh was claimed to be a Tribal God, who was jealous and looked for a particular tribe. But the emphasis was that "other gods were put before him" not that there was "No God but Him" (even though this was said a few times, but doesn't make any sense when he's the God of one tribe). Jews were not monotheists, in my belief. But what I call "dedicated to one God" polytheists. Like Hindus today that just worship at the temple of Shiva only. Moses and others would have been dedicated to One God, saying he was the Lord and the greatest of all. But also limiting him to a tribe.
Jesus even disproved his faith unknowingly when he said "Let he who has not sinned throw the first stone." As Yahweh (who you call God) had not given that condition and allowing stoning to happen for centuries. Meaning, Yahweh couldn't have been omniscient and omnibenovelent and Christianity was just a farce. As to believe this actually happened, necessarily entails Jesus was a cruel idiot. Truth is, Jesus stood up against Yahweh and only appealed to Judaism in the exoteric, but wanted to make it null in the esoteric.
Every religion says that about itself, even Islam. But no, it's copying and outright plagiarism. And often to preserve their tracks and footsteps in the snow, they call the origin "heretical" and "satanic" instead of giving it the least it deserves in credit.
Those claims have no academic merit. They make a fine mixture of logical fallacies, misinformation, ignorance, pseudoscientific fringe theories, and unsubstantiated conspiracy theories, the basis of which is found in some kind of a hunch rather than in evidence, facts or objective reality. Apparent similarities or parallels between two subjects, whether them existing side by side, or with one existing before the other, are no ground for causal connection, or for positive dependency, of one on the other, for them to be the result of copying or plagiarizing (rather than a universal impulse).
First, the claimed similarities have to exist to be begin with, to be real substantiated similarities, particular rather than general, superficial, vague or universal, to be forthcoming rather than contrived and pushed. Second (after the first is met), there must exist some historical evidence for a causal connection of one causing the other or of one having positively depended on the other.
The view that Christianity has pagan roots, rather than being wholly rooted in Judaism has no academic merit in this day and age, neither does the view 'Judaism itself having pagan roots (and therefore also Christianity)'. You will need to demonstrate that what is essential/particular to Judaism/Christianity is similar to and rooted in paganism.
'Japanese-Jewish common ancestry' is a fringe theory, and the language table displayed is contrived (one only needs to google this stuff; Is Japanese related to Hebrew? - Quora)
You claim the virgin birth is pagan, when in reality a) it is rooted in the Old Testament (fulfilled historically with the birth of Jesus), and b) no pagan virgin birth narrative exists.
You also claim Ash Wednesday is pagan when in reality it is rooted in the Old Testament (as well as in the NT). It reflects a common practice in the OT that occurred during intense periods of fasting, prayer and supplication, and of recognizing and remembering one's mortality and repentance (both of which the ashes symbolized); Genesis 3:19, Job 42:6, 2 Samuel 13:19, Daniel 9:3, 1 Maccabees 3:47; see also 4:39, Esther 4:1, 14:1-3, Numbers 19:9, 19:17, Jonah 3:6 (also Matthew 11:21, Hebrews 9:13). You are yet to provide the pagan roots of this practice as is laid out here. It is also established that the Jews did this every year; on a yearly basis they had a public day of fasting, it was called Yom Kippur. Jesus' commandment about not showing outward signs of fasting is meant for the private act of fasting, or the act of fasting in general, not with regard to the public day. Same with regard to prayer.
How is (or ever was) the incarnation of God in Christianity similar to, let alone rooted in, Buddhism, at any point in Christian doctrinal history? Unless you mean "gnostics, in the name of Christians and Christianity, where some of whom believed that the material world (and therefore the body) is evil and that God merely made an appearance in bodily form, rather than having truly incarnated or becoming -truly man and truly God-", then yes, but then again this isn't Christianity.
Feel free to substantiate your other claims by pointing out how is 'the Christian Baptism not rooted in the Old testament, but is rooted in paganism'? And where and how 'is the Eucharist found in and previously celebrated by many pagan cults long before Christianity'?
'Judaism initially being polytheistic or having evolved from polytheism (and paganism) into becoming monotheist' is another fringe theory countered by reality. All the evidence at hand point to Judaism in all its prophets (i.e. the Israelites since the time of Abraham forward and thru their prophets), were actively officially monotheists in sharp contrast to polytheism and paganism.
'The entire thrust of the Old Testament is about God declaring Himself to be the only real God, the One who created everything, who won't share His glory with anyone else, who prevails in every nation, in every setting, who created and owns everything, etc.'
The fringe theorists reliance on the commandment "you shall not have other gods before me" in an attempt to support their otherwise unfounded view that Judaism was monolatristic (which is a kind of polytheistism in the sense of Judaism being dedicated to one god while affirming the existence of other gods), rather than monotheistic in the known/proclaimed sense, is found to have no merit when one happens to actually read the Old Testament starting from Genesis onward and examine what's in the larger context; throughout the OT, 'God is angry with people for serving and worshiping false gods, even people who aren't Israelite'. How then is the God of Abraham affirming the existence of other gods (as the fringers claim), when he is rebuking humans, Israelites and non-Israelites alike, for serving and worshiping what they claim and hold as god(s) other than Him?
Moreover, "the Israelites struggle against polytheism throughout the entire Old Testament and are frequently punished for/when giving into it. And why are they punished? Not [only] because they are worshiping the wrong god or even merely because they have broken some rules. God charges them repeatedly with failing to show the truth to the world that He is God. Even as early as the Exodus, God acts with the express purpose of showing the world He is God. Monotheism is central to every theme of the Bible."
The ignorance is most flagrant when someone types things of the caliber of; 'Christianity is in no way in agreement or in a continuation of Judaism. Like Islam did to Christianity, Christianity did to Judaism. It mummified all its prophets into names you mention while not even bothering to know them'. Rhetorically; can you point to where else can we know about those prophets other than the Christian scriptures - which consist of both the Old testament (the hebrew bible) and the New Testament - and explain why is it that the Christian scriptures consist of both Testaments?
With regards to the following nonsensical claim of yours, i couldn't even get what you mean (i appreciate if you rephrase it): "Jesus even disproved his faith unknowingly when he said "Let he who has not sinned throw the first stone." As Yahweh (who you call God) had not given that condition and allowing stoning to happen for centuries. Meaning, Yahweh couldn't have been omniscient and omnibenovelent and Christianity was just a farce. As to believe this actually happened, necessarily entails Jesus was a cruel idiot. Truth is, Jesus stood up against Yahweh and only appealed to Judaism in the exoteric, but wanted to make it null in the esoteric."
Lastly, i'd like to leave a note in the words of C.S Lewis; “Now the story of Christ is simply a true myth: a myth working on us the same way as the others, but with this tremendous difference that it really happened: and one must be content to accept it in the same way, remembering that it is God’s myth where the others are men’s myths: i.e., the Pagan stories are God expressing Himself through the minds of poets, using such images as He found there, while Christianity is God expressing Himself through what we call 'real things'.”