So if I ask Bandar if you speak for what he thinks your answer is you speak for yourself and he speaks for himself, how would this answer the question?lol because this is a public forum and this is how things work in a public forum, people comment on and answer questions, regardless whether they were addressed directly at them or not It is too complicated I know!
Stop beating around the bush, you said Salam did not run because he was protesting, why didn't Hariri protest? He was a chicken like you and Salam had more balls?
Let's start here were Christians marginalized or not?
Is this subject cornering you that much and putting the spotlight on you too much to expose your wrongdoings that you so refuse to discuss it?
Danny I have a question. Our candidate for March 14, Doctor Samir Geagea, went to the parliament and officially listed himself as a candidate. He did not receive enough votes to win, but at least he was open and democratic about his intentions.
Why doesn't Aoun do the same thing? March 14 and March 8 Christians both were told by their Muslim allies: decide who you want as president, and we will vote for him. So why doesn't Aoun go to the parliament and run democratically instead of sending his qazam in law to knock on the door of Qoraytem? Why doesn't Aoun go and face our candidate in parliament, the legal way as outlined in our great constitution?
I know your reply is: the parliament is illegitimate, but then, why are you seeking any kind of deal for the presidency with an illegitimate parliament? Why is the parliament legitimate enough to vote if Aoun has already been agreed upon, but not legitimate enough to vote when Aoun isn't already agreed upon?
Oops I think I stepped on your tail. Bye bye mousey! Have a pleasant 24 hour cycle.
what is specifically "bazee2" in my description?
the reality? LoL
yes my dear z, l 7a2i2a btejra7, I know, bass we can't change the facts
Ya set Nayla you called me "empty people" ness fadiyeen... This is where you personal attacks and baze2a came from then you proceeded to claim that I am a follower so on and so forth. Character assassination and personal attacks are baze2a ya Nayla, that simple.
Give that advice to your friends in FM... not to attack Aoun, that is
Really? You didn't shit La7oud when he was president? Or sleiman before he went to Saudi Arabia and came back 180 degree changed?
Or should I remind you of what you said about Patriarch Raii.
You're being so biased.
There's a difference between disagreeing publicly and engaging in a full on assault.
True. Aoun disagreed many times with the President or the Patriarch, but he haven't crossed lines, unless you want to speak of Bkerki incident back in 1989. It is a much more complicated story than Aoun vs. Sfeir.
On other hand, it is you who disrespected president Lahoud as Hmedeh did, or did you forget 7amlet fel where you guys were about to storm the presidential palace if it wasn't of Patriarch Sfeir who told you that Baabda palace is a red line for Christians? Wasn't that a full assault on the highest Christian post in the country?
How about calling the Patriarch a satanist? Is that also disagreeing publicly?
And until FM (Salam included) pulls itself out of the Saudi slavery, not just axis, it's going to be impossible not just a hard sellI would but he really does make him and his son-in-law really do make themselves easy targets with all their antics. But in all seriousness, until the FPM pulls itself out of the Iranian-Syrian axis it's going to be a hard sell. Whether or not you think the FM supports extremists, as Sunnis they see the encroachment of Iran through HA in Lebanon and Syria as a threat and rightfully so.
Man... why does everything have devolve in LF vs. FPM between us. I'm not going to address your points, because it's almost an identical conversation every time.
I will say one thing. As much as I respect the seat of the president, Lahoud should have been removed by force, and I do not disagree with such tactics. He was an insult to the presidency and still is. He made us weaker and not stronger. It would have also set a precedent to any head of state that decides to deal with the devil against his people.
I was just doing some clarifications and straightening up your false accusations against Aoun.
What I understand from your last post that you adopt a full assault against the president... a thing you were trying to shame and frame Aoun with.
The difference is that Sleiman was not a crony. Sometimes it's not about the presidency but more about the president himself, as a person. Lahoud was a Syrian installed crony, and I don't think you can disagree with that. If this was a normal country Berri would have been removed from his seat as well.
And until FM (Salam included) pulls itself out of the Saudi slavery, not just axis, it's going to be impossible not just a hard sell
And here you are vindicating FM and Salam while they openly admit taking orders from Saudi Arabia while at the same time issuing a final verdict on Aoun being part of the Iranian axis when he denies it categorically and you have zero evidence that he is.
You should listen to your elders who might know more than you do. Aoun supports HA's resistance and that's about it and this is the full extent to which his involvement in that axis can go or ever went. He takes no orders, like they do, neither from HA nor from Iran. Ask me, I know. If he did, and I am sure you know me, I would have been the first one to leave him.
I already said several times in the past year that I pushed him to seek and accept international support and he refused. He insists on taking a purely Lebanese path to reach his goals. The last time I pushed him and he refused was less than a month ago when everyone had written him off and mocking him that he had been castrated, out of options and totally cornered. Yet he still refused any international meddling even if in his favor.
Be fair... and rational in your judgment